- 30: A New Washington Development Blog
- 08: The End of WaLaw.org
- 08: Zunino v. Rajewski
- 23: Woodinville v. SHARE/WHEEL
- 23: Carpenter v. City of Snohomish
- 10: Lakeland Estates v. King County
- 02: Bilcher v. Cowlitz County
- 01: Kitsap County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board
- 14: Cooke v. City of East Wenatchee
- 13: Academic Items
- 13: Thurston County v. WWGMHB
- 01: Blaine: Define Front
- 31: Update: Spokane Gets The Pool
- 31: Redmond Accepts Tent City
- 31: City of Arlington v. CPSGMHB
- 27: West Richland Zoning
- 25: Woodinville and Bellevue Loosen Up, Ferndale Considers It
- 25: Olympia Officially Allows Unofficial Tent City
- 25: County Pools for City Kids
- 24: Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. Skagit County
- 24: Griffin v. Thurston County
- 13: Recall and Right of Way
- 07: In re: Jeffrey Gene Poole
- 17: Where's the potato train?
- 01: John School
- 27: Like the Case about Tomatos
- 24: West Faces Recall
- 21: When General Rule Meets Unintended Result
- 18: Prof. Calandrillo Wins His Case
- 06: It’s My Land – My Neighbors Be Damned
- 30: Good Trustees?
- 30: File Those Taxes
- 25: Public Disclosure
- 25: Urban Sprawl
- 25: Journalism or Advocacy?
- 25: Wal-Mart in Lakewood
- 25: Water Quality of Beaches
- 25: AP Wire of Law Fixes
- 18: Revise Ethics, Impress 49 States
- 15: Socialists Prefer Not To Share
- 15: Speak No Evil
- 15: Calandrillo on <i>New London</i>
- 15: Changing Ethics
- 13: Look For More
- 05: The Times Wins 9-0
- 28: Please Leave Your Flair At Home
- 27: Public Disclosure Revisited
- 27: The Limits of the Court